<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box Office Number Ones of 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/</link>
	<description>A Road Without Obstacles Leads Nowhere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Well Hell Michelle</title>
		<link>http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-356035</link>
		<dc:creator>Well Hell Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/#comment-356035</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about Spiderman 3... not that good.  

Ocean&#039;s 13 is much better than Ocean&#039;s 12 so you should give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about Spiderman 3&#8230; not that good.  </p>
<p>Ocean&#8217;s 13 is much better than Ocean&#8217;s 12 so you should give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-355998</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/#comment-355998</guid>
		<description>Run, run far away from Epic Movie.  I made the mistake of seeing it on DVD from Netflix and...well, that is 80 minutes of my life gone.  Seriously, I could&#039;ve been watching a test pattern and laughed more.  A terrible, revolting, unfunny film.  Do you get the idea I didn&#039;t like it?  How in the name of all that is good it was number one is beyond me.  

As for Ghost Rider, it was also pretty darn unrecommendable.  

And Spidey 3 was good.  I enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Run, run far away from Epic Movie.  I made the mistake of seeing it on DVD from Netflix and&#8230;well, that is 80 minutes of my life gone.  Seriously, I could&#8217;ve been watching a test pattern and laughed more.  A terrible, revolting, unfunny film.  Do you get the idea I didn&#8217;t like it?  How in the name of all that is good it was number one is beyond me.  </p>
<p>As for Ghost Rider, it was also pretty darn unrecommendable.  </p>
<p>And Spidey 3 was good.  I enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logtar</title>
		<link>http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-355997</link>
		<dc:creator>logtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/#comment-355997</guid>
		<description>Bee Movie Link is fixed, thanks Mark :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bee Movie Link is fixed, thanks Mark <img src='http://blog.logtar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markl</title>
		<link>http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-355996</link>
		<dc:creator>Markl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/#comment-355996</guid>
		<description>Skip &quot;The brave one&quot;.  Resident evil was a good mindless zombie killing movie. Worth the rent if you like that sort of stuff.  Night at the museum was a good family flick. Didnt like ghost rider of spidey3.  Beowolf was ok, but the 3d in the theater made me ill,  to much camera movement.
Your Bee movie link is the wrong movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skip &#8220;The brave one&#8221;.  Resident evil was a good mindless zombie killing movie. Worth the rent if you like that sort of stuff.  Night at the museum was a good family flick. Didnt like ghost rider of spidey3.  Beowolf was ok, but the 3d in the theater made me ill,  to much camera movement.<br />
Your Bee movie link is the wrong movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-355991</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/#comment-355991</guid>
		<description>Dude, link building sucks! I hate it. I do it now just out of habit, but I&#039;ve given up hope of making my 35 cents off of someone buying whatever I&#039;ve linked to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, link building sucks! I hate it. I do it now just out of habit, but I&#8217;ve given up hope of making my 35 cents off of someone buying whatever I&#8217;ve linked to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-355965</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logtar.com/2008/01/12/box-office-number-ones-of-2007/#comment-355965</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a lot of link building that you did:)  I&#039;ve seen quite a few on the list and I think this is one of the weakest movie years in a long time.  Most of the &quot;hits&quot; were really bad, so I might suggest you look up Entertainment Weekly&#039;s critical collection to see how they were rated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a lot of link building that you did:)  I&#8217;ve seen quite a few on the list and I think this is one of the weakest movie years in a long time.  Most of the &#8220;hits&#8221; were really bad, so I might suggest you look up Entertainment Weekly&#8217;s critical collection to see how they were rated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

